Review



anti toll like receptor tlr 4  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti toll like receptor tlr 4
    Anti Toll Like Receptor Tlr 4, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tlr+4/10__3389_slash_fimmu__2026__1734997-73-4-12
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti toll like receptor tlr 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Membrane:

    Article Title: Bi2O2Se nanosheets coated with rosmarinic acid for colon-targeted treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
    Article Snippet: The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within colonic tissue represents a critical factor in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).. The application of antioxidant therapy utilizing artificial nanozymes has emerged as an effective strategy for the management of IBD.. Nevertheless, current nanozymes exhibit limitations in stability, tissue compatibility, and systemic toxicity, which constrain their applicability within the biomedical domain.

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Bi2O2Se nanosheets coated with rosmarinic acid for colon-targeted treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
    Article Snippet: The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within colonic tissue represents a critical factor in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).. The application of antioxidant therapy utilizing artificial nanozymes has emerged as an effective strategy for the management of IBD.. Nevertheless, current nanozymes exhibit limitations in stability, tissue compatibility, and systemic toxicity, which constrain their applicability within the biomedical domain.

    Article Title: Neutrophil membrane-derived nanoparticles protect traumatic brain injury via inhibiting calcium overload and scavenging ROS
    Article Snippet: .. Determining the concentrations of protein, the cell extraction incubated with primary antibody was performed overnight at 4 ◦ C. The following primary antibodies were used: Integrin β1 (Abcam, 1:1000, USA), CXCR4 (Abcam, 1:100, USA), Mac-1 (CST, 1:1000, USA), mTOR (CST, 1:1000, USA), p-mTOR (CST, 1:1000, USA), PI3K (CST, 1:1000, USA), p-PI3K (CST, 1:1000, USA), TLR-4 (CST, 1:1000, USA), NF-kB (CST, 1:1000, USA), p-NF-kB (CST, 1:1000, USA), GAPDH (CST, 1:1000, USA), Na–K ATP (CST, 1:1000, USA). ..

    Aqueous Normal-phase Chromatography:

    Article Title: Pharmacological inhibition of ICOS attenuates the protective effect of exercise on cardiac fibrosis induced by isoproterenol.
    Article Snippet: Aims: To investigate the cardioprotective mechanism of exercise or exercise combined with inducible costimulatory molecules (ICOS) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy against isoproterenol (ISO)-induced cardiac

    Immunohistochemistry:

    Article Title: Porphyromonas gingivalis Lysate Induces TLR-2/4-Dependent NF-κB Activation and Inflammatory Damage in the Human Placental Barrier
    Article Snippet: HPEs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, paraffin-embedded, sectioned (3–5 μm), and stained with H&E for histology or with Masson’s trichrome and Picrosirius Red for collagen (dyes were acquired from Merck ® , Darmstadt, Germany). .. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against TLR-2, TLR-4, and NF-κB p65 (Cell Signaling ® , Danvers, MA, USA) after antigen retrieval. .. Detection was via HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and DAB (Cell Signaling ® , Danvers, MA, USA).

    Extraction:

    Article Title: Neutrophil membrane-derived nanoparticles protect traumatic brain injury via inhibiting calcium overload and scavenging ROS
    Article Snippet: .. Determining the concentrations of protein, the cell extraction incubated with primary antibody was performed overnight at 4 ◦ C. The following primary antibodies were used: Integrin β1 (Abcam, 1:1000, USA), CXCR4 (Abcam, 1:100, USA), Mac-1 (CST, 1:1000, USA), mTOR (CST, 1:1000, USA), p-mTOR (CST, 1:1000, USA), PI3K (CST, 1:1000, USA), p-PI3K (CST, 1:1000, USA), TLR-4 (CST, 1:1000, USA), NF-kB (CST, 1:1000, USA), p-NF-kB (CST, 1:1000, USA), GAPDH (CST, 1:1000, USA), Na–K ATP (CST, 1:1000, USA). ..

    other:

    Article Title: Fever-Range Hyperthermia Promotes Macrophage Polarization towards Regulatory Phenotype M2b
    Article Snippet: Toll-like Receptor 4 , TLR-4 , #14358 , Rabbit IgG , Cell Signaling Technology.



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress tlr 4
    CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation <t>via</t> <t>TLR4</t> signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
    Tlr 4, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tlr+4/TLR4%2C+Human/pmc13418511-283-2-14
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Servicebio Inc tlr 4
    CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation <t>via</t> <t>TLR4</t> signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
    Tlr 4, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tlr+4/anti+tlr4/10__1016_slash_j__prp__2026__156482-98-8-17
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech tlr 4
    CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation <t>via</t> <t>TLR4</t> signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
    Tlr 4, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tlr+4/TLR4+Antibody/pm41900484-56-14-26
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems tlr 4
    CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation <t>via</t> <t>TLR4</t> signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
    Tlr 4, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tlr+4/Human+TLR4+PerCP-conjugated+Antibody/pm41698943-87-10-12
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology tlr 4 antibody
    CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation <t>via</t> <t>TLR4</t> signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
    Tlr 4 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tlr+4/TLR4+Antibody/pmc12765070-49-8-18
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr 4 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti toll like receptor tlr 4
    CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation <t>via</t> <t>TLR4</t> signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
    Anti Toll Like Receptor Tlr 4, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tlr+4/10__3389_slash_fimmu__2026__1734997-73-4-12
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti toll like receptor tlr 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation via TLR4 signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: Integrated Single‐Cell and TCR Profiling Reveals Protection‐Associated CD8 + T Cell Subsets Linked to Viral Control in PRRSV

    doi: 10.1002/advs.76732

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CD8 + T cells preferentially receive signals from macrophages /monocytes for activation via TLR4 signaling. (A) Communications between APC and CD8 + T cells within each experimental group as inferred by CellPhoneDB. (B) Analysis of the expression level of antigen presentation‐related genes in indicated cell subclusters. (C) Dot plot showing normalized mean expression level of genes involved in innate immunity in indicated subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis of innate immunity‐associated pathways for differentially upregulated genes in the subclusters of macrophages and monocytes. The enrichment level is determined by the number of included genes and their expression levels. (E) Percentage of cells containing virus RNA fragments in the indicated cell clusters. (F, G) Role of TLR4 signaling in T cell activation. The spleen cell mixture from three pigs of JXA1R groups at 5dpc were prepared. The ability to secret IFN‐γ was determined using ELISpot in the presence of TAK‐242, a TLR4 inhibitor or absence of macrophage/monocytes that were depleted by mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD14. The representative ELISpot wells (F) and statistical analysis (G) were presented. (H, I) Role of TLR8 signaling in T cell activation with TLR8 inhibitor. The representative ELISpot wells (H) and statistical analysis (I) were presented. Statistical analysis was performed by two‐tailed Student's t‐test, and error bars indicate means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Asterisks (*) indicate the statistical significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: For the TLR‐4 or TLR‐8 loss‐function assay, the CD14‐deleted cells were pre‐incubated with TAK‐242 (MCE, #243984‐11‐4) or CU‐CPT8m (MCE, #HY‐112050) at a final concentration of 5 μM for 2 h, followed by the addition of virus, and ELISpot was then performed.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Expressing, Immunopeptidomics, Virus, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Bioprocessing, Two Tailed Test

    Schematic model summarizing immune features associated with protection and pathogenesis. In the protected group, antigen presentation is associated with specialized subset of macrophages and monocytes characterized by high TLR4 and pro‐inflammatory signals expression. With appropriate CD4 + T cell help, these CD8 + T cells acquire robust cytotoxic effector functions and mediate efficient antiviral immunity. In contrast, in unprotected animals, antigen presentation is associated with monocyte populations expressing suppressive and inhibitory signals. CD8 + T cells in this context exhibit increased expression of exhaustion‐associated markers, especially CTLA4 , together with reduced effector functionality. Aberrant CD4 + T cell–CD8 + T cell communication further reinforces T cell exhaustion, ultimately resulting in impaired antiviral responses and disease progression.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: Integrated Single‐Cell and TCR Profiling Reveals Protection‐Associated CD8 + T Cell Subsets Linked to Viral Control in PRRSV

    doi: 10.1002/advs.76732

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic model summarizing immune features associated with protection and pathogenesis. In the protected group, antigen presentation is associated with specialized subset of macrophages and monocytes characterized by high TLR4 and pro‐inflammatory signals expression. With appropriate CD4 + T cell help, these CD8 + T cells acquire robust cytotoxic effector functions and mediate efficient antiviral immunity. In contrast, in unprotected animals, antigen presentation is associated with monocyte populations expressing suppressive and inhibitory signals. CD8 + T cells in this context exhibit increased expression of exhaustion‐associated markers, especially CTLA4 , together with reduced effector functionality. Aberrant CD4 + T cell–CD8 + T cell communication further reinforces T cell exhaustion, ultimately resulting in impaired antiviral responses and disease progression.

    Article Snippet: For the TLR‐4 or TLR‐8 loss‐function assay, the CD14‐deleted cells were pre‐incubated with TAK‐242 (MCE, #243984‐11‐4) or CU‐CPT8m (MCE, #HY‐112050) at a final concentration of 5 μM for 2 h, followed by the addition of virus, and ELISpot was then performed.

    Techniques: Immunopeptidomics, Expressing, Biomarker Discovery